IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 14.05.2026 Sukhwinder Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Chairman, PSPCL, The Mall Patiala and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. R.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby the suit filed by the appellant for permanent injunction, has been dismissed by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff/appellant had filed a Suit for Permanent Injunction interalia “……restraining the defendants, their agents officials, agents and representatives from disconnecting the supply of electricity Tubewell connections bearing A/c No. K/1230AP, 2HP and A/c No.K2/655 installed in the land of the plaintiff and his co-sharers bearing Khasra No. 51//8/1, 13/2 and 44//5/2, situated at Village Bhohru, Tehsil and District Amritsar in any manner whatsoever may be.”

3. It was the pleaded case of the appellant that originally land bearing khasra No. 51//8/1, 13/2 and 44/5/2 was owned by Chanan Singh, grand father of the plaintiff. After his death,