IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHWINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN PSPCL THE MALL PATIALA AND OTHERS – Respondent
RSA_2201_2024
##PAGE1##
RSA-2201-2024 (O&M) 1 of 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
130 RSA-2201-2024 (O&M)
Date of decision: 14.05.2026
Sukhwinder Singh ...Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Chairman, PSPCL, The Mall Patiala and others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. R.S.Chauhan, Advocate
for the appellant.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
The plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent
judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby the suit
filed by the appellant for permanent injunction, has been dismissed by
both the District Courts.
2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff/appellant had filed a
Suit for Permanent Injunction interalia “……restraining the defendants,
their agents ofÏcials, agents and representatives from disconnecting the
supply of electricity Tubewell connections bearing A/c No. K/1230AP, 2HP
and A/c No.K2/655 installed in the land of the plaintiff and his co-sharers
bearing Khasra No. 51//8/1, 13/2 and 44//5/2, situated at Village Bhohru,
Tehsil and District Amritsar in any manner whatsoever may be.”
3. It was the pleaded case of the appellant that originally land
bearing khasra No. 51//8/1, 13/2 and 44/5/2 was owned by Chanan Singh,
DIVYANSHI
2026.05.15 15:57
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##RSA-2201-2024 (O&M) 2 of 7
grand father of the plaintiff. After his death, the said land was inherited by
plaintiff, Shamsher Singh, and Amandeep Singh. Plaintiff had got half
share from the said land. It was averred that there were two tube well
electric connections bearing account no. A/1230AP, 2HP; and account No.
K2655 in the above said land. Plaintiff and other co-sharers used to
irrigate the said land from the said tubewells. In 1993, ofÏcials of the
defendant had tried to disconnect the connection. Plaintiff had filed Civil
Suit bearing Nos. 141/93 and 190/93; and during the pendency of the said
suits, the Sub Divisional OfÏcer of the respondent-Corporation had
suffered a statement and tube well connections were restored after
completing all formalities. It was alleged that on 21.06.2017, ofÏcials of
the defendant-Corporation visited the land of plaintiff and threatened to
disconnect the tube well connection illegal and forcibly. Hence, present
suit was filed on 13.05.2019.
4. Upon appraisal of the pleadings and the evidence led by the
parties, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar had dismissed
the suit of the plaintiff vide judgment and decree dated 25.11.2019. The
Civil Appeal filed by the plaintiff was dismissed by the learned Additional
District Judge, Amritsar vide judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024.
Hence, the present second appeal by the plaintiff.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant inter alia submits that
despite the fact that appellant had produced material evidence on record;
and despite the admission made by the respondents, suit of the appellant
has been erroneously dismissed without appreciating the material evidence
DIVYANSHI
2026.05.15 15:57
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##RSA-2201-2024 (O&M) 3 of 7
on record. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the
appellant discharged his onus by producing ample evidence. It is pointed
out that the order passed by the Ld. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Amritsar
dated 13.03.1997 was produced on record as Ex.P1 and Ex.P2 and the
receipt of amount deposited as Ex.P3 and Ex.P4. Even the death certificate
of Chanan Singh and Balwant Singh as well as Will executed by Chanan
Singh were produced on record as Ex.P5, Ex.P6 and Ex.P7. It is submitted
that even the documentary evidence has been ignored by learned District
Courts. Thus, the impugned judgments and decrees have been passed in a
mechanical manner and the contentions and arguments raised by the
appellant have not been considered, which shows non-application of
judicious mind.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that the
respondents led the evidence and examined Executive Engineer Manpreet
Singh, SDO, Sarai Amanat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.