IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TARSEM LAL – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDER KAUR – Respondent
CR_4655_2016
##PAGE1##
CR-4655-2016 (O&M) (cid:1)(cid:2)
Sr. No.124
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR-4655-2016 (O&M)
Date of decision: 14th May 2026
TARSEM LAL .....…Petitioner
versus
RAVINDER KAUR ........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Present: Mr. Bhrigu Dutt Sharma, Advocate and
Mr. Ameesh Gautam, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate
for the respondent.
HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J.
1. The present Civil Revision has been filed under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 21.03.2015, passed by
the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Rent Controller, Jalandhar,
dismissing the application filed by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC
as well as the order dated 16.05.2016, passed by the learned Additional
District Judge, Jalandhar, dismissing the appeal filed by petitioner against
the order passed by the Rent Controller.
2. The respondent-landlord filed an ejectment petition under
Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for
ejectment of the petitioner from the demised premises on the ground of non-
payment of arrears of rent and on the ground that the petitioner had illegally
occupied the demised premises. Ex parte ejectment order was passed in
favour of the respondent. After the filing of the execution proceedings, the
SIMRANDEEP KAUR
2026.05.21 09:49
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CR-4655-2016 (O&M) (cid:3)(cid:2)
petitioner filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside
the ex parte ejectment order. The said application was dismissed by the
learned Rent Controller and the same was upheld by the Appellate Court.
3. The dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority had been
challenged by way of filing the present Civil Revision.
4. While issuing notice of motion, the ejectment orders passed by
the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority were stayed vide
order dated 25.07.2016, subject to the following terms and conditions:-
“xxx xxx xxx xxx
(i) The petitioner-tenant will pay/deposit the entire due rent upto
August, 2016 within two weeks.
(ii) He will keep on paying/depositing the advance rent/mesne profits
of subsequent months on or before 7th day of each month.
(iii) He will file affidavit before the Rent Controller within three
weeks giving details of entire payment of rent/mesne profits.
xxx xxx xxx xxx”
5. Vide order dated 24.07.2019, learned counsel for the petitioner
was directed to inform the Court as to whether the order dated 25.07.2016
has been complied with. Again, vide order dated 22.04.2025, the petitioner
was directed to file an affidavit regarding the compliance of the aforesaid
order dated 25.07.2016.
6. Today, Mr. Narinder S. Lucky, Advocate has put in appearance
on behalf of the respondent and filed ‘vakalatnama’, which is taken on
record.
7. Learned counsel for the respondent informs that the petitioner-
tenant has not deposited the subsequent arrears in compliance with the order
dated 25.07.2016.
SIMRANDEEP KAUR
2026.05.21 09:49
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CR-4655-2016 (O&M) (cid:4)(cid:2)
8. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he
has tried to contact the petitioner but he could not have instructions, as such,
no affidavit could be filed in compliance with the order dated 22.04.2025.
9. It is evident that the order dated 25.07.2016, regarding the
deposit of mesne profits and arrears of rent, has not been complied with by
the petitioner-tenant.
10. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case, this
Court is of the opinion that the Civil Revision is a discretionary relief. The
petition is liable to be dismissed on account of non-compliance of the
interim order passed by this Court.
11. Consequently, the present petition stands dismissed.
12. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN)
JUDGE
14th May 2026
simran
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
SIMRANDEEP KAU
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.