IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MONIKA BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA KAUSHAL ROZGAR NIGAM LTD – Respondent
CWP_15061_2026
##PAGE1##
1
CWP-15061-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
128 CWP-15061-2026
Date of Decision: 14.05.2026
Monika Bhatia
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam Limited and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present : Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate for respondent No.2.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral)
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227
of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue
with her service in the office of respondent No.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the
petitioner was initially appointed as a Clerk on 01.06.2009 on contractual
basis through an outsourcing agency and has continuously served the
respondents ever since. It is submitted that the services of the petitioner
subsequently came to be protected under the provisions of the Haryana
Contractual Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024 and the Amendment
PUNEET CHAWLA
2026.05.15 14:08
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##2
CWP-15061-2026
Act, 2025 and she was duly extended the benefit of the said enactments.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has rendered more than 17 years
of continuous, satisfactory and unblemished service to the respondents.
2.1 It is further contended that the petitioner was falsely implicated
in FIR No.4 dated 16.02.2026 registered under Sections 7 and 13(1)(b) read
with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station
ACB, Faridabad (Annexure P-1). However, the petitioner was granted
regular bail vide order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the learned trial Court
(Annexure P-2). Learned counsel submits that despite grant of bail, when the
petitioner approached the respondents for joining duties, she was not
permitted to resume service. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner submitted
representations dated 27.03.2026 and 03.04.2026 (Annexures P-3 and P-4)
followed by reminder dated 17.04.2026 requesting restoration of her
services, however, no action has been taken thereupon till date.
2.2 Learned counsel further submits that neither any order
terminating the services of the petitioner has been passed, nor has she been
placed under suspension. It is argued that no show cause notice, charge-
sheet or memorandum of allegations has ever been served upon the
petitioner and no departmental proceedings or inquiry under the applicable
service rules has been initiated against her. Learned counsel submits that the
Haryana Punishment and Appeal Rules, 2016 are applicable to employees
protected under the Haryana Contractual Employees (Security of Service)
PUNEET CHAWLA
2026.05.15 14:08
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##3
CWP-15061-2026
Act, 2024 and, therefore, the respondents are legally bound to adhere to the
prescribed statutory procedure before taking any adverse action affecting the
service rights of the petitioner.
2.3 It is further argued that the action of the respondents in forcibly
discontinuing the petitioner from service without issuance of any formal
order, suspension order, charge-sheet, show cause notice or departmental
proceedings is wholly arbitrary, illegal and violative of the principles of
natural justice. Learned counsel submits that mere registration of an FIR
does not automatically authorize the employer or State instrumentalities to
keep an employee out of service indefinitely without following the
mandatory procedure established under the applicable rules and law. Such
action, it is argued, amounts to imposing a punitive consequence without
affording the petitioner any opportunity of hearing and is violative of
Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
2.4 At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ petition may be treated as a comprehensive representation and a
direction be issued to the respondents/com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.