SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80288

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ASHU SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

229 CRM-M-26188-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision : 14.05.2026 Ashu Sharma ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishal Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Sanchit Punia, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.

This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.454 dated 23.09.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2)

of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station City Hisar, District Hisar.

2. The abovementioned FIR came into being at the instance of ‘Prerna’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated by the above-named complainant that the marriage of her brother Amardeep was solemnized with Krishma, and that after marriage, the mother and step- father of Krishma used to harass complainant’s father Vijay Ahuja. According to complainant, Krishma had even sold the gold jewelle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top