IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRITIKA – Appellant
Versus
VICE CHANCELLOR PANDIT B D SHARMA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ROHTAK – Respondent
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral)
1. The instant writ petition impugns the order dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-10), passed by the respondent No.1-Vice Chancellor, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, whereby, acting upon the recommendations of the Board of Discipline, the petitioner, has been expelled with immediate effect and has been debarred from re-admission in respondent university or the college/institution (respondent no.5). She also seeks a direction upon the respondents to declare the result of subject no.4, i.e. Forensic Medicine and Toxicology of 3rd Professional, Part-1 of MBBS, which has been withheld by respondent no.1.
2. Assailing the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the same is vitiated by a patent violation of the principles of natural justice and is, on this ground alone, liable to be set aside. It is submitted that prior to the passing of the impugned order, the Vice Chancellor neither afforded the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing, nor supplied her with a copy of the recommendations of the Board of Discipline, thereby depriving her of an effective opportunity to submit a comprehensive response.
3. On merits as well, l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.