*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the order dated 06.06.2018 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed, and also for quashing of the order dated 02.11.2017 (Annexure P-5), whereby the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face the trial.

2. As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, complainant Jarnail Singh stated that on 27.09.2013 at about 6.30 p.m., he along with his brothers Raj Kumar and Ram Parshad were standing on the road near their house and were talking with each other. In the meantime, Sukhbir and Ram Nath sons of Genda Ram, Jaswinder son of Ram Nath also came at the spot and talks were being held about the mortgage of our land, because the land of his brother Jasmer had been mortgaged with Rekha Rani wife of Sukhbir about seven years ago and on account of this, a dispute has erupted between them. It was further alleged that on hearing the noise of dispute, Rekha Rani and Salochna wife of Ram Nath also reached at the spot. Rekha Rani was having a gandasi in her hand, who has given it to her husband and Salochna was having a sword in her hand which she had given to her husband Ram Nath. Thereafter, Sukhbir hit him with the gandasi on his head, which he was holding in his hand and hit on the finger of his left hand and wrist, Ram Nath hit his brother Raj Kumar on his left foot with the Sword and others hit with brick bats. His brother Ram Parshad has been hit by all the above with brick bats. It was also stated that they have also inflicted injuries to them in self defense and thereafter, the assailants ran way with their respective weapons.

3. During the investigation, the petitioner Jasvinder Singh was found innocent by the police and was kept in column No.2 of the challan. Thereafter, charges were framed and statements of the witnesses were recorded. PW-3 Ram Parshad, while appearing in the witness box, stated that “on 27.9.2013 at about 6.30 p.m, I and my brother Jarnail Singh and Raj Kumar were standing outside our house, then in the meantime, Sukhbir, Ram Nath and Jasvinder also came there and on their coming, we were talking about our land, which Jasmer had mortgaged with Rekha Rani wife of Sukhbir. We were having talks with Sukhbir, Ram Nath, Jasvinder and we had a tiff with them and after that Sukhbir’s wife Rekha Rani who was having a gandasi in her hand, gave it to Sukhbir and Sukhbir hit the gandasi on the head of Jarnail, on his left hand and also on left arm. Salochna wife of Ram Nath came with a sword and Ram Nath hit Raj Kumar on his left leg and after that, Jasvinder hit me with brick bats and salochna and Rekha Rani also hit with brick bats and stones.” Thereafter, after recording the statement of PW-3 Ram Parshad, one of the alleged injured, an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. was moved by the injured/complainant for summoning of Jasvinder Singh as an additional accused to face trial along with the other co-accused. It is relevant to mention here that earlier also, an application was moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C., which was dismissed by the Court of learned JMIC vide order dated 05.04.2017.

4. Aggrieved by the said order, the complainant had filed a revision petition, which was allowed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide judgment dated 09.08.2017, whereby while setting aside the order dated 05.04.2017, the trial Court was directed to pass a fresh order. In pursuance of the directions issued by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, the trial Court, after hearing the parties afresh, passed the impugned order dated 02.11.2017, whereby the petitioner has been summoned to face trial along with the other accused.

5. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, a revision petition was filed by the present petitioner before the Court o