SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the order dated 06.06.2018 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed, and also for quashing of the order dated 02.11.2017 (Annexure P-5), whereby the petitioner has been summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to face the trial.

2. As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, complainant Jarnail Singh stated that on 27.09.2013 at about 6.30 p.m., he along with his brothers Raj Kumar and Ram Parshad were standing on the road near their house and were talking with each other. In the meantime, Sukhbir and Ram Nath sons of Genda Ram, Jaswinder son of Ram Nath also came at the spot and talks were being held about the mortgage of our land, because the land of his brother Jasmer had been mortgaged with Rekha Rani wife of Sukhbir about seven years ago and on account of this, a dispute has erupted between them. It was further alleged that on hearing the noise of dispute, Rekha Rani and Salochna wife of Ram Nath also reached at the spot. Rekha Rani was having a gandasi in her hand

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top