IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KIRANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP_14692_2026
##PAGE1##
CWP-14692-2026 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
123
CWP-14692-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 12.05.2026
Kiranjit Kaur and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate
with Mr. D.S. Maan, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of
mandamus, directing the respondents to transfer the pension from
petitioner No.1 to petitioner No.2 on account of the request submitted
by the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that
the husband of petitioner No.1 was appointed as Peon on 21.06.2001
and he died in harness on 14.12.2013, as is evident from the Death
Certificate (Annexure P-1). He further submits that the petitioners,
being the widow (petitioner No.1) and the minor daughter (petitioner
No. 2), born on 10.10.2013 (Annexure P-4), are the only surviving
MOHD YAKUB
2026.05.12 17:33
I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of
this document
Punjab & Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh.
##PAGE2##CWP-14692-2026 2
family members of the deceased employee. He further contends that
owing to the inordinate delay on the part of the respondents in releasing
the service benefits of deceased employee, the petitioner No.1 was
constrained to approach this Court by way of filing CWP No.5022 of
2021, which was disposed of vide order dated 03.03.2021 (Annexure P-
2), and in compliance thereof, the pensionary benefits were released in
favour of petitioner No. 1 vide Pension Payment Order (PPO) dated
14.06.2021 (Annexure P-3). Learned counsel for the petitioners further
submits that since petitioner No.1 now intends to remarry she has
voluntarily moved an application dated 17.12.2025 (Annexure P-5)
seeking transfer of the family pension in favour of her minor daughter
i.e. petitioner No.2, who is admittedly an eligible family member in
terms of the Family Pension Scheme (Annexure P-6), which expressly
recognizes unmarried daughters up to the age of 25 years as eligible
recipients of family pension. He further contends that despite serving a
legal notice dated 11.03.2026 (Annexure P-7), the respondents have
failed to take any action in the matter. Lastly, he submits that the issue
involved is no longer res integra, as an identical controversy has already
been adjudicated by this Court in CWP No.4835 of 2025, decided on
20.02.2025 (Annexure P-8), wherein it has been categorically held that
an eligible family member is entitled to receive family pension and
therefore, the petitioners are entitled to similar relief.
3. Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate, has put in appearance
on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3 and filed Memo of Appearance,
MOHD YAKUB
2026.05.12 17:33
I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of
this document
Punjab & Haryana High Court,
Chandigarh.
##PAGE3##CWP-14692-2026 3
which is taken on record. The Registry is directed to tag the same at
appropriate place.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3
submits that petitioner No.1 has not yet been remarried, however, her
claim would be considered as and when she submit the proof of her re-
marriage and the family pension would be transferred in the name of
petitioner No.2 within a period of six weeks thereafter.
5. In response thereto, learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that he is satisfied with the stand taken by learned counsel for
respondents No.2 and 3 and contends that the present petition may be
disposed of accordingly.
6. In the wake of the statement made by learned counsel for
respondents No.2 and 3, the present petition is disposed of and the
respondent/Corporation is directed to consider and decide the claim of
the petitioners as and when petitioner No.1 furnishes the proof of her
re-marriage and thereafter, pass appropriate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.