SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHYAM SUNDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

229 Decided on : 12.05.2026 Shyam Sunder . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana ****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, seeking grant of regular bail, in case, FIR No.197, dated 12.06.2021, under Sections 148, 149, 302, 342. 379-B, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Dabwali, District Sirsa.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after noticing of the facts, almost similarly situated co-accused, namely; Hansraj allegedly armed with rubber pipe, Surender and Chhinder, allegedly armed with dandas, have already been released on bail, vide common order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-3), passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-23804-2023, titled as, “Surender and another v. State of Haryana” and CRM-M-35769-2024, titled as, “Hansraj v. State of Haryana”.

Further submits that since the role assigned to the petitioner is almost similar and taking note of all the relevant facts including the injuries

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top