2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80730
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEHA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
ROHIT GUPTA – Respondent
TA_308_2024
##PAGE1##
TA-308-2024 (O & M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
144
CM-9871-CII-2026 in/and
Transfer Application No.308 of 2024 (O & M)
Date of decision :-12.05.2026
Neha Gupta
…..Applicant
Versus
Rohit Gupta
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate
for the applicant.
Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate
for the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
CM-9871-CII-2026
Prayer in this application is for placing on record Annexures
P-6 to P-15 and for exemption from filing true
typed/certified/translated/photocopy of Annexures P-6 to P-15.
Allowed as prayed for.
TA-308-2024 (O & M)
1. The present transfer application has been filed by the
applicant-wife seeking transfer of the case bearing HMA/34/2024
(Annexure P-1) titled as “Rohit Gupta vs. Neha Gupta” from the Court of
learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Tarn Taran to the competent Court
of jurisdiction at Family Court, Ludhiana or its camp at Khanna.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
was married to the respondent on 06.9.2008. One daughter was born out of
their wedlock on 24.10.2013, who is presently in the care and custody of
VIJAY ASIJA
2026.05.15 08.34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##TA-308-2024 (O & M) 2
the applicant. In 2018 the parties alongwith their daughter had moved to
Australia, where, matrimonial dispute arose between the parties. In
Australia, the applicant had filed the Child Support, which was not given
by the respondent. The applicant and the respondent had taken a joint
home loan, which was also being paid by the applicant as the respondent
has stopped paying the loan installments. Ultimately, in December 2023,
the respondent came to India and in January 2024, he promptly filed the
instant petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter
called ‘the Act’).
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the said
petition under Section 13 of the Act has been filed by the respondent
through his Power of Attorney holder i.e. his brother-in-law. The
respondent himself is residing and working in Bangalore. The applicant is
also appearing before the learned Family Court, Tarn Taran through her
Power of Attorney holder i.e. her father, as the applicant is presently
residing in Australia alongwith her daughter. It is submitted that the father
of the applicant is suffering from cancer and therefore is unable to travel
the distance of 182 kilometers between Ludhiana, where he used to reside;
and the Family Court at Tarn Taran. The mother of the applicant had also
expired due to cancer. As such, father of the applicant lives by himself and
is unable to handle the litigation at Family Court Tarn Taran.
4. It is submitted that as the applicant was unable to pay the
installments of the home loan alone, she had moved an application
(Annexure P-12) before the Family Court at Australia for selling the house
at Australia, so that the applicant may got some funds. In the said
application the notice was issued to the respondent, to which the
respondent, vide e-mail (Annexure P-8) responded. It is submitted that the
applicant had also filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. at Khanna,
VIJAY ASIJA
2026.05.15 08.34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##TA-308-2024 (O & M) 3
which is now pending adjudication for 01.6.2026. It is accordingly prayed
that keeping in view the above facts, the present application be allowed and
the case bearing HMA/34/2024 (Annexure P-1) be transferred from the
Family Court, Tarn Taran to the Family Court, Ludhiana or its camp at
Khanna.
5. Per contra learned counsel for the respondent opposes the
submissions of the applicant and submitted that the applicant had
previously filed a petition under the Domestic Violence Act at Khanna,
which was dismissed vide order dated 15.11.2025 by the learned Sub
Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khanna on the grounds of jurisdiction under
Section 27. It is established position in law that convenience of the wife is
to be seen, how