IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY LAKSHMI AND ANOTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP_14636_2026
##PAGE1##
APURVA
2026.05.14 17:36
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
##PAGE2##the meetings convened by the Sarpanch nor supporting the developmental
works of the village. It is further submitted that due intimation regarding the
various meetings was duly forwarded to the learned District Development
and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur, however, no action has been taken by the
said authority. Rather, the petitioners have been served with a Show Cause
Notice (Annexure P-6) indicating that since the Gram Panchayat, Village
Niamta, Block Dorangala, District Gurdaspur, has failed to utilize a grant
amounting to Rs.4,54,477/- towards developmental works in the village,
accordingly, proceedings under Section 200 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj
Act, 1994, would be initiated for appointment of an Administrator of the
Gram Panchayat in case the works are not commenced.
2.1
3. At this stage, Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Senior Deputy
Advocate General, Punjab, and Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, appear on
behalf of the respondent-State and respondents No.6 to 9, respectively, in
pursuance of the advance copies of paper book having already been supplied
to them. Power of Attorney filed by Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, in Court
today, is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
4. Learned State counsel submits that before taking any action
with regard to the appointment of an Administrator of Gram Panchayat,
Village Niamta, Block Dorangala, District Gurdaspur, the response
(Annexure P-7) submitted by the petitioners shall be duly considered by the
APURVA
2026.05.14 17:36
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
##PAGE3##learned District Development and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur, and an
appropriate speaking order shall be passed thereon, in accordance with law,
after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned
State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ
petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
APURVA
2026.05.14 17:36
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.