SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80756

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY LAKSHMI AND ANOTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP_14636_2026



##PAGE1##

APURVA

2026.05.14 17:36

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this

document/judgment

High Court, Chandigarh

##PAGE2##

the meetings convened by the Sarpanch nor supporting the developmental

works of the village. It is further submitted that due intimation regarding the

various meetings was duly forwarded to the learned District Development

and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur, however, no action has been taken by the

said authority. Rather, the petitioners have been served with a Show Cause

Notice (Annexure P-6) indicating that since the Gram Panchayat, Village

Niamta, Block Dorangala, District Gurdaspur, has failed to utilize a grant

amounting to Rs.4,54,477/- towards developmental works in the village,

accordingly, proceedings under Section 200 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj

Act, 1994, would be initiated for appointment of an Administrator of the

Gram Panchayat in case the works are not commenced.

2.1

3. At this stage, Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Senior Deputy

Advocate General, Punjab, and Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, appear on

behalf of the respondent-State and respondents No.6 to 9, respectively, in

pursuance of the advance copies of paper book having already been supplied

to them. Power of Attorney filed by Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, in Court

today, is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

4. Learned State counsel submits that before taking any action

with regard to the appointment of an Administrator of Gram Panchayat,

Village Niamta, Block Dorangala, District Gurdaspur, the response

(Annexure P-7) submitted by the petitioners shall be duly considered by the

APURVA

2026.05.14 17:36

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this

document/judgment

High Court, Chandigarh

##PAGE3##

learned District Development and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur, and an

appropriate speaking order shall be passed thereon, in accordance with law,

after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties.

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned

State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ

petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.

APURVA

2026.05.14 17:36

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this

document/judgment

High Court, Chandigarh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top