IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
L R Y LABOUR CONTRACTOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP_14193_2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.170 CWP-14193-2026
Date of decision : 12.05.2026
L. R. Y. Labour Contractor .…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. J. S. Kaliraman, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A. G., Punjab.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4.
* * * * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
1. Through this petition challenge is made to the order dated 30.04.2026
through which the petitioner has been blacklisted from entering into contracts with
the respondent-Market Committee, Ludhiana for a period of two years.
2. The penalty of debarment or as it is commonly referred to as
blacklisting, results in civil death of an entrepreneur. It has a huge adverse impact
on the person’s or entity’s reputation. Not only the present but also the future
business prospects are adversely affected. Therefore, such penalty cannot be
sustained if the imposition thereof is not preceded by a specific notice in this regard
to the affected person or entity.
3. It is not disputed that in the present case, before passing the impugned
order dated 30.04.2026, through which the petitioner was blacklisted, neither in this
regard any notice was served upon the petitioner nor was the petitioner afforded
any personal hearing. Therefore, the impugned order is unsustainable in law.
SHAMSHER SINGH
2026.05.15 10:17
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
document
Punjab and haryana high court,
chandigarh
##PAGE2##CWP-14193-2026 [ 2 ]
4. Our view finds support from the following observations by the
Supreme Court in UMC Technologies Private Limited vs. Food Corporation of
India and another-(2021) 2 SCC 551:-
“13. At the outset, it must be noted that it is the first principle of civilised
jurisprudence that a person against whom any action is sought to be taken or
whose right or interests are being affected should be given a reasonable
opportunity to defend himself. The basic principle of natural justice is that
before adjudication starts, the authority concerned should give to the affected
party a notice of the case against him so that he can defend himself. Such
notice should be adequate and the grounds necessitating action and the
penalty/action proposed should be mentioned specifically and unambiguously.
An order travelling beyond the bounds of notice is impermissible and without
jurisdiction to that extent. This Court in Nasir Ahmad v. Assistant Custodian
General, Evacuee Property, Lucknow and Anr., (1980) 3 SCC 1 has held that
it is essential for the notice to specify the particular grounds on the basis of
which an action is proposed to be taken so as to enable the noticee to answer
the case against him. If these conditions are not satisfied, the person cannot be
said to have been granted any reasonable opportunity of being heard.
14. Specifically, in the context of blacklisting of a person or an entity by the
state or a state corporation, the requirement of a valid, particularized and
unambiguous show cause notice is particularly crucial due to the severe
consequences of blacklisting and the stigmatization that accrues to the
person/entity being blacklisted. Here, it may be gainful to describe the concept
of blacklisting and the graveness of the consequences occasioned by it.
Blacklisting has the effect of denying a person or an entity the privileged
opportunity of entering into government contracts. This privilege arises
because it is the State who is the counterparty in government contracts and as
such, every eligible person is to be afforded an equal opportunity to participate
in such contracts, without arbitrariness and discrimination. Not only does
blacklisting takes away this privilege, it also tarnishes the blacklisted person’s
reputation and brings the person’s character into question. Blacklisting also
has long-lasting civil consequences for the future business prospects of the
bl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.