SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80827

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
L R Y LABOUR CONTRACTOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.170 CWP-14193-2026 Date of decision : 12.05.2026 L. R. Y. Labour Contractor .…. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate, with Mr. J. S. Kaliraman, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A. G., Punjab.

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4.

* * * * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)

1. Through this petition challenge is made to the order dated 30.04.2026 through which the petitioner has been blacklisted from entering into contracts with the respondent-Market Committee, Ludhiana for a period of two years.

2. The penalty of debarment or as it is commonly referred to as blacklisting, results in civil death of an entrepreneur. It has a huge adverse impact on the person’s or entity’s reputation. Not only the present but also the future business prospects are adversely affected. Therefore, such penalty cannot be sustained if the imposition thereof is not preceded by a specific notice in this regard to the affected person or entity.

3. It is not disputed that in the prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top