SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 80844

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE JALANDHAR – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS – Respondent


****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)

1. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act for setting aside the judgment dated 12.03.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Petition No.1521 of 2014.

2. Respondent No.1-Mohinder Kumar Sharma, who was working as a Process Server, filed a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the appellant to pay interest @ 18% per annum on the delayed payment of Gratuity with effect from 31.05.2007 i.e. the date of his retirement, till 29.10.2013, when the aforesaid benefit was paid to him.

3. The learned Single Judge allowed the said writ petition vide judgment dated 12.03.2018 and directed the appellant to pay interest @ 9% per annum to respondent No.1 for the period from 01.09.2007 to 09.02.2012 on account of belated settlement of retiral benefits.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that respondent No.1, who was working as a Process Server, was facing disciplinary proceedings prior to his retirement and therefore, at the time of his retirement on 31.05.2007, his Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity (DCRG) was withheld in terms of Rule 9.14(c) of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top