SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. – Respondent


HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. With the consent of the parties, the above-mentioned writ petitions are taken up together and are being decided by this common judgment. For the sake of brevity, the facts are being taken from CWP No.27264 of 2013.

2. The CWP No.27264 of 2013 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of impugned order dated 19.07.2013 (Annexure P-10) and further to issue a direction to the respondents to release the withheld retiral benefits of the petitioner along with interest from the date of his retirement.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner retired from the post of Manager after attaining the age of superannuation on 31.05.2011. Three months after retirement, respondent No.2 served the petitioner with a charge-sheet on 16.08.2011 under Rule 19 of the HAFED Common Cadre Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules, 1988") on the allegations of less storage gain of wheat. The petitioner filed a detailed reply to the chargesheet on 24.01.2012 (Annexure P-3). Consequently, on 29.05.2012, the petitioner made a representation to re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top