SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MK SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA GRAMIN BANK AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

106 CWP-7987-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 MK Saxena .....Petitioner VERSUS Haryana Gramin Bank And Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present:- Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG Haryana.

Mr. Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent-Bank.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J. (Oral)

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of impugned speaking order dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the respondent-Bank, and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner salary and remuneration for the period from 28.08.2019 to 18.07.2022, to fix his pay in the lower grade at a stage commensurate with his past service of over 23 years, and to recompute all retiral benefits including pension, gratuity and leave encashment on the basis of such corrected pay-fixation, along with all consequential benefits and interest.

BRIEF FACTS

2. Briefly the facts of the case is that the petitioner was dismissed from servi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top