SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81048

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 MANJIT SINGH ....Petitioner V/s JAGRAJ SINGH AND OTHERS .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Garg, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

The instant revision petition assails the order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Barnala, vide which the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘CPC’) for rejection of plaint, was allowed and the petitioner/plaintiff was ordered to affix ad-valorem court fee on the amount of compensation claimed.

2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition are that a suit for damages and compensation on account of registration of a false case and for the loss suffered by the petitioner/plaintiff (Annexure P-2) was instituted with the following prayer:-

“Therefore, by filing this plaint, it is prayed that the suit of Rs.27,50,000/- being damages and compensation for lodging a false case and loss suffered may kindly be decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top