SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81119

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JARNAIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral):

Since the issue involved in both the appeals is identical, both the appeals are being disposed of vide instant common order and judgment.

The above mentioned appeals have been preferred by the convicts/appellants, hereinafter being referred to as ‘appellants’ only, in the backdrop of a judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.11.2004, rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge (ad hoc), Fast Track Court Ludhiana. The above mentioned judgment was passed in a trial conducted by the above mentioned Court for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 307, 379 and 34 Indian Penal Code, hereinafter being referred to as ‘IPC’ only.

In nut-shell the facts emerging from record are that, that for the commission of aforesaid offence the FIR No. 144, dated 10.10.2000 was lodged in Police Station Bati Jodhewal. Pursuant to above mentioned FIR when the investigation was complete, all the three appellants were sent to face trial for the commission of above mentioned offence. The above mentioned trial culminated into conviction of the appellants and they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment as under:-

Rakesh Kumar Under Section 307 IPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top