SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81294

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
TEJWINDER SINGH – Respondent


##PAGE1##

CR-3553-2026 (O&M)(cid:1) Page 1 of 5 (cid:1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

124 CR-3553-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 28.04.2026

Rajinder Kumar ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Tejwinder Singh ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

Present:- Mr. Ashish Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Revision Petition has been filed by the defendant seeking

setting aside of the order dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P6) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Samrala whereby application filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of plaint, has

been allowed.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the plaintiff had originally filed a Suit for permanent injunction on the basis of Agreement to Sell dated 26.07.2023. The petitioner had even filed written statement to the said Civil Suit. However, during the pendency of the Suit, the respondent had moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of plaint to add prayer in the head note to the effect “Suit for

SUNENA

2026.04.30 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

(cid:1)

##PAGE2##

CR-3553-2026 (O&

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top