IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 28.04.2026 Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and another ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Dayanand through his LRs ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Kewal Krishan, Advocate for Mr. S.K.Mahajan, Advocate for the appellants.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Defendants are in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents for permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case as pleaded in the plaint are that the plaintiffs had purchased Killa No. 26/14/1/1/6 measuring 0K-3M from Jagat in the year 2006 and vacant possession thereof was handed over to the plaintiff. In 2007, plaintiff applied for an electric connection for tubewell to the defendants. All formalities were completed as required. Plaintiff deposited an amount of Rs.20,000/- as security vide receipt dated 27.12.2007, which amount was subsequently refunded by the defendants. Defendants had issued an electric connection to the plaintiff for tubewell in the aforesaid Killa No. 26/14/1/1/6 vide Account No. APOB-158