SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81327

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAMESH SANKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Petitioner Ramesh Sanka filed petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing and setting aside impugned order dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram vide which anticipatory bail granted in favour of present petitioner vide order dated 24.04.2020 by Duty/learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram has been cancelled, with further direction to surrender before the Court within a period of three weeks in FIR No. 58 dated 30.03.2020 under Section 381 and 409 IPC (Section 306 & 316(5) BNS, 2023) registered at Police Station Sector-65, Gurugram (Annexure P-2), with further prayer to stay the operation of aforesaid impugned order or any other relief which the Court may deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of case.

2. Learned counsel representing petitioner argued that on the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR No. 58 dated 30.03.2020 (Annexure P-2) (supra) has been registered. He was granted interim anticipatory bail by the Court of the then Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram dated 11.04.2020 (Annexure P-3), which was made absolute by the then Additional Sessions Judge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top