##PAGE1##

RSA-1392-2026 (O&M) -:1:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA-1392-2026 (O&M)

(138 Date of Decision:28.04.2026

Bhupinder Singh … Appellant

Versus Manjit Kaur

... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:- Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. R.K. Shukla, Advocate for the caveator/respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellant–defendant assailing the judgment and decree dated 16.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court were affirmed in toto. The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fatehgarh Sahib, vide judgment and decree dated 29.07.2023, had decreed the suit instituted by the respondent–plaintiff seeking relief of possession along with permanent injunction. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court, contending that the concurrent findings returned by both the Courts below are vitiated by patent illegality, perversity, and misappreciation of the evidence on record.

GAURAV SOROT 2026.04.