In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 Pardeep Kumar Sharma alias Pardeep Sharma ... Petitioner(s)

Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh.

Present: Mr. Jagjit Singh Sarao, Advocate for the petitioner(s) [Through Hybrid Mode].

Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, for U.T. Chandigarh/respondent.

Mr. Abhishek Narang and Mr. Hitender Atri, Advocates for the complainant.

Surya Partap Singh, J.

1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No. 110 dated 01.08.2024, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 406 & 420 of ‘the Indian Penal Code, 1860’ and Section 66D of ‘the Information Technology Act, 2000’ Police Station Mani Majra, U.T.

Chandigarh.

2. Vide order dated 03.02.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall

3. Heard.

4. It has been submitted by learned cou