IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUNDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
247(2 cases)+219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20712-2026 Anil Kundu …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CRM-M-20717-2026 Aman @ AP …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CRM-M-21559-2026 Rohit …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondents Decided on: 24.04.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-20712-2026 and CRM-M-20717-2026)
Mr. Naveen Siwach, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (in CRM-M-21559-2026)
Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana Ms. Anjali Chaudhary, Advocate for the complainant ****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL)
1. By way of this common order, all the above-mentioned petitions are being decided together as they arise out of the same FIR and common allegations.
2. All the above mentioned accused namely–(i) Anil Kundu (ii) Aman @ AP and (iii) Rohit have filed bail petitions under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioners, during the pendency of trial, who have been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-
FIR No. Date Section(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.