SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUNDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


247(2 cases)+219 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20712-2026 Anil Kundu …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CRM-M-20717-2026 Aman @ AP …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …...Respondent CRM-M-21559-2026 Rohit …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondents Decided on: 24.04.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-20712-2026 and CRM-M-20717-2026)

Mr. Naveen Siwach, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (in CRM-M-21559-2026)

Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana Ms. Anjali Chaudhary, Advocate for the complainant ****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of this common order, all the above-mentioned petitions are being decided together as they arise out of the same FIR and common allegations.

2. All the above mentioned accused namely–(i) Anil Kundu (ii) Aman @ AP and (iii) Rohit have filed bail petitions under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioners, during the pendency of trial, who have been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-

FIR No. Date Section(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top