IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARJIT KAUR ETC. – Appellant
Versus
VISHAL SINGH ETC. – Respondent
FAO_4258_2002
##PAGE1##
(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
209 FAO-4258-2002(O&M)
Date of Decision: 24.04.2026
(cid:1)
(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:4)(cid:13)(cid:19)(cid:1) ...Appellants
Versus
(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:17)(cid:14)(cid:1)and Another ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Vikas Mohan Gupta, Advocate, and
Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate, and
Ms. Tanvi Aggarwal, Advocate,
for the appellants.
Mr. A.S. Sidhu, Advocate
for respondent No.2-Insurance Company. (through VC)
(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:20)
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present appeal has been filed by the claimants-appellants
seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the learned Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal, Mansa (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned
Tribunal’), vide award dated 02.05.2002. The learned Tribunal awarded a
sum of ₹2,03,600/- with 9 % interst p.a., on account of the death of Gurmeet
Singh in a motor vehicular accident involving Jeep No. RJV-5267, which
occurred on the night of 28.06.2000 due to rash and negligent driving of
respondent No.1.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants–claimants submits that the
impugned award is wholly inadequate and calls for enhancement. It is
contended that the learned Tribunal has erred in assessing the monthly
income of the deceased, Gurmeet Singh, at a meagre sum of ₹2,100/-,
treating him as a mere skilled labourer, despite cogent evidence on record
indicating that the deceased was earning ₹3,500/- per month. It is further
SHUBHAM -1-
2026.05.01 16:23
I am the author of this
document
##PAGE2##(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)(cid:14)
urged that the learned Tribunal has incorrectly applied the multiplier of 12,
whereas, considering that the deceased was 38 years of age at the time of the
accident, the appropriate multiplier ought to have been higher. Additionally,
it is submitted that no addition towards future prospects has been made, nor
has just and reasonable compensation been awarded under the conventional
heads, future income and loss of life. On the aforesaid premises, it is prayed
that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal be suitably enhanced
in accordance with law.
3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent
No.2–insurance company contends that the award passed by the learned
Tribunal is just and reasonable and calls for no interference. It is submitted
that the income has been rightly assessed in the absence of cogent evidence,
the multiplier applied is appropriate, and the compensation awarded under
the conventional heads is in accordance with law. It is, thus, prayed that the
present appeal be dismissed.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record with their able assistance. Upon a perusal of the record, this Court
finds that the compensation awarded is not 'just' and suffers from manifest
legal errors.
5. The primary issue that arises for considerati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.