SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 81793

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATNAM AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

783 CRA-S-4126-SB-2018 (O&M)

Decided on: April 24, 2026.

SATNAM AND ANOTHER ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ PRESENT Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. J. (ORAL)

The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.09.2018 passed by the Special Judge, Kaithal, in Sessions (NDPS) case bearing No.37 dated 23.11.2016 arising out of FIR bearing No.197 dated 26.10.2016, under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), registered at Police Station Guhla, District Kaithal, whereby the appellants have been convicted for commission of offence under Section 15 (b) of the NDPS Act, for having been found in possession of 02 kilograms of poppy straw and vide order of even date have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months.

2 In brief,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top