IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 23.04.2026 Ronak Ram Bansal ….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate, and Ms. Aashima Jindal, Advocate, Mr. Khushwant Saharan, Advocate, and Ms. Chetna Rao, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. A.V.S Parmar, Advocate, for Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4.

****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral)

1. Vide instant writ petition, as cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the order dated 23.04.2024 (Annexure P-9), passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Kaithal (respondent No.2).

2. In brief, the petitioner-senior citizen instituted an application, under Section 22 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2007”) before the learned Appellate Tribunal, Kaithal, seeking eviction of private respondents No.3 and 4 (son and daughter-in-law), from the property/shop in question. However, upon consideration of the matter in issue, the learned Appellate Tr