##PAGE1##

(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:9)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

(121)

CR-3453-2026

Date of Decision:-23.04.2026

Gurpal Singh

……Petitioner

Versus

Baljit Singh @ Rinku and Others

……Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

****

Present: Mr. Chetan Bansal, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227

of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the order dated

02.03.2026, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar,

whereby the application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908, for implementation of the stay order dated 08.09.2022

with the aid and assistance of the police authorities, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had filed a civil

suit for permanent injunction against the respondents. Along with the suit,

an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC was also filed

seeking interim relief. Vide order dated 08.09.2022, the learned trial Court

restrained the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of

-1-

SHUBHAM

2026.04.24 16:06

I am the author of this

document

(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:9)

the petitioner over the suit property and from dispossessing him therefrom

except in due course of law. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an application

under Section 151 CPC seeking implementation of the aforesaid stay order

with the aid and assistance of the police authorities. However, the said

application has been dismissed by the learned trial Court vide order dated

02.03.2026. Hence, the present petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the limited

prayer in the present revision petition is that the learned trial Court be

directed to first decide the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2

CPC and thereafter consider and decide the application under Section 151

CPC afresh, within a time-bound period.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have

perused the paper book.

5. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed,

issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as the same would

only delay the proceedings and entail unnecessary expense.

6. Considering the averments made in the petition, the present

revision petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case. The learned trial Court is directed to decide the

application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC within a period of one

month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, and

thereafter to decide the application under Section 151 CPC on its own

merits, expeditiously, if filed afresh.

-2-

SHUBHAM

2026.04.24 16:06

I am the author of this

document

(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:9)

7. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the

learned trial Court, Amritsar, for immediate compliance.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL)

JUDGE

23.04.2026

Shubham

Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No

Whether Reportable:- Yes/No

-3-

SHUBHAM

2026.04.24 16:06

I am the author of this

document