SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 82123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KAPIL AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
INDERJIT AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

230 Date of decision: 23.04.2026 Kapil and another ...Appellant(s)

VERSUS Inderjit and another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Roja Agnihotri, Advocate for the appellant(s)

(Legal Aid Counsel).

Mr. Sagar Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG Haryana.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 19.08.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal whereby the appeal preferred against the judgment dated 08.02.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Karnal, acquitting the appellants-accused, was allowed and the appellants were convicted for commission of offence under Sections 323, 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and ordered to be released on probation.

2. As there was no representation on behalf of the appellants, Ms. Roja Agnihotri, Advocate, was appointed as a Legal Aid Counsel to assist this Court on behalf of the appellants.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the FIR in the present case was registered on the complaint of respondent No.1 Inderjit Singh, wher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top