SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 82258

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DHARAMVIR MOR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDER SINGH & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DHARAMVIR MOR AND OTHERS ......Appellants Vs.

MAHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ......Respondents Reserved on: 21.04.2026 Pronounced on: 22.04.2026 Uploaded on: 27.04.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Mamta Saini, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate and Ms. Navjot Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. R.C.Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 11.09.2015 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs.19,06,000/- along with interest @ 9 % per annum on account of death of deceased Manjeet Kaur in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on

29.03.2012.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top