SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 82389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

281 Date of decision: 22.04.2026 ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL GOYAL ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *****

Present: - Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, Asst. A.G. Punjab.

Mr. Abhinav Chaudhary, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.87 dated 11.08.2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Shahpur Kandi, District Pathankot along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2. The above FIR had been registered on the statement of Anil Kumar son of Satpal resident of Bharat Nagar, Pathankot who alleged that he is the owner of Malhotra Ind: Growth Centre, Plot No.E-120 Pathankot.

The relevant extract of the same is reproduced as under:

“Anil Goyal and Satish Kumar had entered into an agreement with me on 26.06.2024 for sending steel scrap. As per the terms of the agreement,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top