IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
281 Date of decision: 22.04.2026 ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL GOYAL ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *****
Present: - Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, Asst. A.G. Punjab.
Mr. Abhinav Chaudhary, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.87 dated 11.08.2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS, 2023 registered at Police Station Shahpur Kandi, District Pathankot along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-2).
2. The above FIR had been registered on the statement of Anil Kumar son of Satpal resident of Bharat Nagar, Pathankot who alleged that he is the owner of Malhotra Ind: Growth Centre, Plot No.E-120 Pathankot.
The relevant extract of the same is reproduced as under:
“Anil Goyal and Satish Kumar had entered into an agreement with me on 26.06.2024 for sending steel scrap. As per the terms of the agreement,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.