SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 82434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL DEVI & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

221 FAO-8706-2015(O&M)

Date of decision: 22.04.2026 Naresh Kumar ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Sunil Devi & Others ...Respondent(s)

***

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate Mr. Sagar Dangi, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Vinod Chaudhri, Advocate for respondent No.7.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-27610-CII-2015 This is an application under Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 100 days in re-filing the appeal.

After going through the contents of the application, which is supported by affidavit of learned counsel for the appellant, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and delay of 100 days in re-filing the present appeal is condoned.

(cid:1) CM-27611-CII-2015 This is an application filed by the applicant/appellant/owner of the offending vehicle under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1605 days in filing the appeal. Reason for seeking condonation of such inordinate delay is given in Para 2 of the present application that: -

“2. That the impugned award dated 25.01.2011 passed by the ld. Tribunal Rewari. It is pertinent to mention here that the above mentioned award was decided ex-pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top