IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MANMOHAN SHARDA AND OTHERS – Respondent
FAO_2032_2026
##PAGE1##
FAO-2032-2026 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(130/1) FAO-2032-2026(O&M)
Date of decision- 21.04.2026
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. ...Appellant(cid:1)
Versus
Manmohan Sharda and Others ... Respondents(cid:1)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocate (cid:1)
for the appellant-Insurance Company.(cid:1)
Ms. I.S. Kooner, Advocate,(cid:1)
for the respondent No.1-caveator.
(cid:1)
***
(cid:1)
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant–Insurance
Company seeking to set aside the Award dated 18.10.2025 passed by the learned
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hoshiarpur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the
learned Tribunal’) whereby the claim petition filed by respondents No. 1, 2 and 3-
claimants on account of the death of Usha Sharda, wife of respondent No.1 in a
motor vehicular accident on 18.05.2024, has been allowed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant–Insurance Company contends that
the learned Tribunal has erred in law and on facts while passing the impugned
award dated 18.10.2025, awarding an excessive compensation of Rs.16,90,200/-
with interest @ 7% per annum, as the monthly income of the deceased has been
SHUBHAM
2026.04.27 16:16 -1-
I am the author of this
document
##PAGE2##FAO-2032-2026 (O&M)
arbitrarily assessed at Rs.12,250/- without considering the inconsistent salary
reflected in the record and ought to have been taken on an average basis. Further,
the learned Tribunal has wrongly adopted dual income parameters and ignored the
deposition relevant documents indicating lower earnings. Furthermore, the grant of
Rs.5,40,000/- towards household services is legally unsustainable as the deceased
was a full-time salaried employee, resulting in impermissible dual compensation.
Subsequently, it is contended that the learned Tribunal has erred in treating all
claimants as dependents, including the married daughter living separately, and
despite clear evidence that the husband and major son were financially
independent, has wrongly applied deduction of 1/3rd and multiplier method.
Consequently, the entire assessment is stated to be based on conjectures and
surmises, without proper deductions towards personal expenses, rendering the
impugned award excessive and liable to be modified/reduced. Reliance has been
placed on Sushila and Others v. Sudhakar and Another Civil Appeal No.4213 of
2026.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3-claimants
submits that the award passed by the learned Tribunal does not suffer from any
irregularity or infirmity, and that the findings recorded therein are well-reasoned on
the basis of the material available before the learned Tribunal. It is accordingly
contended that no ground is made out for interference in appeals. Reliance has been
placed on Laxmidhar Nayak and others v. Jugal Kishore Behera and Others
2018 (1) SC 746 and Sunita v. Vinod Singh and Others
2025 INSC 366
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the record,
with their able assistance.
SHUBHAM
2026.04.27 16:16 -2-
I am the author of this
document
##PAGE3##FAO-2032-2026 (O&M)
5. In view of the rival submissions, the following issues arise for
consideration before this Court:
(i) whether the grant of compensation towards household services, in addition to
the income of the deceased, amounts to impermissible double compensation; and
(ii) whether the claimants, namely the husband, a major earning son, and a
married daughter, could be treated as dependents for the purpose of computation
of compensation.
6. The contention of the appellant–Insurance Company that the grant of
compensation towards household services, in addition to the income of the
deceased, amounts to impermissible double compensation, does not merit
acceptance. The concept of “household services” is not confined merely to cases
where the deceased is a non-earning housewife; rather, it encompasses the
multifaceted contribution made by an individual towards the famil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.