IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRINCE @ ADALKHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
CRM-M_8219_2026
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-8219-2026 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.237
CRM-M-8219-2026
Decided on : 20.04.2026
Prince @ Adalkha
...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ...... Respondent
CORAM : (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:8)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:17)(cid:12)(cid:15)(cid:14)(cid:8)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:6)
***
Present : Mr. Kunal Choksi, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana
for the respondent-State.
***
(cid:8)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:18)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:7)(cid:17)(cid:12)(cid:15)(cid:14)(cid:8)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:6)(cid:8), J (ORAL)
1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for grant of regular bail to the
petitioner in case FIR No.119 dated 04.12.2024 registered under Sections
316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sections 238(c),
319, 61 of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act added later on), at Police Station
Cyber Jhajjar, District Jhajjar.
2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner
along with co-accused duped the complainant for a sum of Rs.83,800/-.
Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with
MAMTA MALHOTRA
2026.04.21 15:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Chandigarh
##PAGE2##CRM-M-8219-2026 2
the said offence. He further contends that the petitioner was neither present
at the spot, nor was named in the FIR and initially the FIR was registered
against unknown persons. It has also been contended that during
investigation, co-accused Rajesh Kumar was arrested and the petitioner has
been nominated as an accused only on the basis of the disclosure statement
made by the said co-accused Rajesh Kumar. Apart from the disclosure
statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the
offence in question and it is a trite law that disclosure statement of the co-
accused during his custodial interrogation is not admissible. He further
submitted that the petitioner has been nominated in the present case by the
prosecution because he is co-accused of Rajesh Kumar in FIR No.94 of
2025. Learned counsel submits that mobile number from which call had
made to the complainant is not registered in the name of the petitioner.
Further, co-accused Ravi Kumar Tiwari, in whose account Rs.36,000/- was
transferred and Rahul Rajput in whose account Rs.20,000/- was transferred
and Raj Kumar have already been granted the concession of bail by the
learned trial Court as well as by this Court. No recovery is to be effected
from the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2025. The
investigation in the case is complete, challan stands presented and charges
have also been framed. He further submitted that out of total 13 prosecution
witnesses, only 01 has been examined till date and as such, the trial will take
a long time to conclude and no useful purpose would be served by keeping
him behind bars. Therefore, it is urged that the petition deserves to be
allowed.
4. (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:2)(cid:8)(cid:7)(cid:9)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:2)(cid:10)(cid:11)
MAMTA MALHOTRA
2026.04.21 15:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Chandigarh
##PAGE3##CRM-M-8219-2026 3
5. Learned State counsel, who has appeared on advance notice of
the petition and has filed the custody certificate. The same is taken on
record. He has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail by
submitting that the offence committed by the petitioner is serious in nature.
He has further submitted that the petitioner is involved in multiple other
cases meaning thereby he is a habitual offender.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at length and after
perusing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.