SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 82993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

206 Decided on : 20.04.2026 Rohit . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG Haryana ****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:-

Name of FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District Petitioner(s)

Rohit, aged 23 85 28.02.2025 333, 308(7), 127(2), 115 Agroha Hisar years of BNS

2. Complainant-Rajesh alias Dholu got registered FIR and the allegations reads as under:

“I, Rajesh @ Dholu S/o Jaikishan, a R/o Mirpur, and my brother Surendra have 35-35 acres of land in Mirpur. Neelam, a R/o Raipur, is married to Raju Janges, a R/o Mirpur. They have two sons. Neelam and Raju are at odds with each other, and she lives in Raipur with her children. Being of my caste, I have been helping her financially, Four or five years ago. I had an al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top