IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.287-72 CWP-5834-2022 Date of decision: 20.04.2026 Veer Overseas Limited ....Petitioner Versus National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present: Mr. Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diya Suri, Advocate Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal Opal, Sr. Standing Counsel (through VC)

for the respondents.

* * *

DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition is directed against the notice dated 30.03.2021, pertaining to the assessment year 2013-14, issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short – 'the Act') on the ground that the said notice was not preceded by the procedure prescribed under Section 148 A of the Act, which provision was introduced through the Finance Act, 2021.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

3. In this case the impugned notice, issued under Section 148 of the Act, is dated 30.03.2021 and as per record of the Income Tax Department which was produced before us, such notice was dispatched to the petitioner prior to 01.04.2021.

4. Notices under Section 148 of the Act, issued and dispatched prior to 01.04.2021, were not required to be preceded by any notice under Section 148A of the Act because Section 148A was prospectively introduced through the Finance Act, 2021 and was to come into effect on or after 01.04.2021. Therefore, such notices would continue to be governed by the unamended provisions. In this regard following observations by the Supreme Court in Union of India and ors. vs. Ashish Agarwal, (2023) 1 SCC 617, can be usefully referred to:-

“22. Thus, the new provisions substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 being remedial and benevolent in nature and substituted with a specific aim and object to protect the rights and interest of the assessee as well as and the same being in public interest, the respective High Courts have rightly held that the benefit of new provisions shall be made available even in respect of the proceedings relating to past assessment years, provided Section 148 notice has been issued on or after 1st April, 2021. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the various High Courts in holding so.

xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx

28. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, the present appeals are allowed in part. The impugned common judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in WT No. 524/2021 and other allied tax appeals/petitions, is/are hereby modified and substituted as under:-

28.1 The impugned Section 148 notices issued to the respective assessees which were issued under unamended Section 148 of the IT Act, which were the subject-matter of writ petitions before the various respective High Courts shall be deemed to have been issued under Section 148A of the IT Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2021 and construed or treated to be show-cause notices in terms of Section 148A(b). The assessing officer shall, within thirty days from today provide to the respective assessees information and material relied upon by the Revenue, so that the assesees can reply to the show-cause notices within two weeks thereafter;

28.2 The requirement of conducting any enquiry, if required, with the prior approval of specified authority under Section 148A(a) is hereby dispensed with as a one-time measure vis- a-vis those notices which have been issued under Section 148 of the unamended Act from 01.04.2021 till date, including those which have been quashed by the High Courts.

28.3 Even otherwise as observed hereinabove holding any enquiry with the prior approval of specified authority is not mandatory but it is for the Assessing Officers concerned to hold any enquiry, if required;

28.4 The assessing officers shall thereafter pass orders in terms of Section 148-A(d) in respect of each of