SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83157

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAHUL NAGAR ALIAS RAHUL ALIAS NANNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

211 CRM-M-19266-2026 Decided on : 17.04.2026 Rahul Nagar @ Rahul @ Nannu . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Saini, DAG, Haryana.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

1. The instant second petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:-

Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police District Petitioner(s) No. Station Rahul Nagar @ 156 13.11.2020 Sections 148, 149, 302, 506 of Bhupani Faridabad Rahul @ Nannu IPC [corresponding Sections 191(2), 189(5), 103, 351(2) of BNS, 2023] & Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 [Sections 450, 212, 379, 411, 468, 472, 120-B of IPC added later on, i.e., corresponding Sections 331(4), 249, 303, 317(2), 336(2), 338, 61 of BNS, 2023]

2. Initial regular bail petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 29.04.2024, passed in CRM-M-44983

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top