IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (117)

Date of Decision:- 16.04.2026 CHETI @ NAIN SINGH @ PRAKASH VIR AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus KHUBI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs AND ANOTHER ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invokes the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to assail the order dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-9) passed by the learned Executing Court, whereby the application filed by respondent No. 1–decree holder seeking permission to deposit ad valorem court fee in terms of the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2014 (Annexure P-1), as affirmed on

04.09.2015 (Annexure P-2), has been allowed.

2. To summarize the relevant facts are that the suit for possession instituted by the respondents–plaintiffs was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 24.02.2014, subject to the condition that ad valorem court fee on the suit property shall be deposited prior to initiation of execution proceedings. The appeal preferred by the present petitioners was dismissed on 04.09.201