IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 08.04.2026 Pronounced on: 16.04.2026 Uploaded on: 18.04.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Ravinder Kumar Malik …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Argued by:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Bhisham Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Karan Singh Sura, Advocate for respondents No.2, 3 and 6.

Mr. Deepender Singh, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Gaurav Bakshi, Advocate and Mr. Nipun Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for setting aside the order dated 17.01.2018 (Annexure P-11), whereby two applications, one under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. for further investigation and the other under Section 311-A Cr.P.C. read with Section 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, in FIR No.545 dated 20.10.2009 registered at Police Station Faridabad Central, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, seeking dire