SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KAMAL – Appellant
Versus
S.D.O. (OP) DIVN DHBVNL AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

121 CR-3173-2026 Date of decision:16.04.2026 KAMAL ...PETITIONER VERSUS S.D.O. (OP) DIVN. DHBVNL AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate for petitioner.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Present civil revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) by petitioner-plaintiff being aggrieved by impugned order dated 20.02.2026 (Annexure P-5) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Faridabad, whereby application filed by petitioner-plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC had been dismissed and by order dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad, whereby appeal filed by petitioner-plaintiff against order dated 20.02.2026 also dismissed.

2. Petitioner-plaintiff had preferred a suit for permanent injunction and along with said suit, an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for ad-interim injunction was also preferred by petitioner-plaintiff. It was asserted that respondents-defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top