IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

119 CR-2771-2026 Date of decision:16.04.2026 NIRMAL KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS NARENDER KUMAR (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS L.RS. AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Sunil Sihag, Advocate for petitioner.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Present civil revision petition has been preferred under Article

227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner-plaintiff-plaintiff being aggrieved by impugned order dated 25.02.2026 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Punhana, whereby application filed by him under Order XVIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) for grant of permission to lead rebuttal evidence has been dismissed.

2. Admittedly, in suit for declaration, petitioner-plaintiff has claimed that he is landlord and exclusive owner of suit property and revenue records reflecting respondent-defendant No.2 to be owner are incorrect and liable to be corrected. Reliance was placed on deed of dissolution dated 31.03.2008. Along with relief of declaration, petitioner-plaintiff had also sought relief of permanent injunction restraining respondents-defendants from