SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83352

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N. S. Shekhawat, H. S. Grewal, JJ
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-D-837-DB-2004



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Tejinder Pal Singh
For the Respondents: Sartaj Singh Gill

In criminal cases involving charges of common intention under Section 34 IPC, if the role assigned to a co-accused is illogical or suspicious, it warrants the benefit of doubt and acquittal, especially when there is evidence of potential enmity or false implication between the parties.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302/34 - Murder - Common Intention - Prosecution based on testimony of eye-witnesses regarding an incident involving a water dispute - Appellant No.1 alleged to have caught the deceased's legs while Appellant No.2 inflicted injuries - Court found ocular evidence against Appellant No.2 credible but raised doubt regarding the presence and role of Appellant No.1 - Held that where the specific role attributed to a co-accused in a situation (holding legs during assault) is unnecessary or suspicious, the conviction based on common intention is unsustainable - Appellant No.1 acquitted, Appellant No.2's conviction upheld.

Facts of the case:
Deceased and appellants had a dispute regarding canal water for irrigation. The incident occurred at night in the fields where the deceased was sleeping on a cot. The prosecution alleged that Appellant No.2 attacked the deceased with a 'kahi' (spade) while Appellant No.1 held the deceased's legs. Following the conviction by the trial court, the appellants challenged the verdict in the High Court, asserting false implication due to prior civil litigation.

Findings of Court:
The medical evidence corroborates the death by homicide. The testimony against Appellant No.2 is consistent and reliable. However, regarding Appellant No.1, the court found it improbable that holding the legs was necessary for an attack on a sleeping person, leading to reasonable doubt regarding his involvement and presence, resulting in his acquittal.

Issues: Whether the prosecution sufficiently established the common intention of both appellants to commit murder and if the identification of the attackers was reliable.

Ratio Decidendi: If the prosecution fails to assign a logical role to a co-accused and the evidence against them creates suspicion of false implication, it is unsafe to convict them for common intention, especially when they are closely related to the primary offender.

Result: Appeal partly allowed. Conviction and sentence of Appellant No.1 set aside. Conviction of Appellant No.2 upheld.

Table of Content
1. summary of trial court findings and prosecution evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. summary of rival contentions regarding criminal culpability. (Para 10 , 11)
3. evaluation of common intention and reliability of eyewitness testimony. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. determination of guilt and final sentencing order. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

1. The appellants filed the present appeal against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 09.09.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur. By the said judgment, Amarjit Singh (appellant No.1) was ordered to be convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, whereas Hardip Singh (appellant No.2) was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. Both the appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 20,000/- each along with the stipulated default conditions.

2. The FIR (Ex.PG) in the present case was registered on the basis of the statement made by Jagdev Singh and the same has been reproduced below:

“Statement of Sardar Jagdev Singh s/o Rattap Singh caste Jat r/o Duggan aged about 48 years.

I am resident of above said address and an ex-serviceman and presently I am working as Sales Officer at Military Canteen, Jammu as private service. I had come on leave from 30.6.01 to 8.7.2001. We were four brothers and three sisters were borne out of the womb of my mother. I and Darbara Singh are married to the daughters of Bhagat Singh of village Meemsa P.S. Dhuri, District Sangrur. We both brothers are living in one house. My other brothers, Karm Singh and Biara Singh, who are elder to me, are residing in separate house. The land owned by my brothers has also been given to my elder brother Darbara Singh on “Theka”. My brother Darbara Singh does the entire agriculture work. My three sisters, Gurdev Kaur, Surjit Kaur and Mohinder Kaur, who are elder to me, are married. At about 8:45 P.M. at night my brother had gone to our Tibbean wala Khet for irrigating land from canal water. Our turn for water was to start at 9:20 P.M. when Amarjit Singh S/o Mukhtiar Singh and his son Hardip Singh @ Kala Jat r/o Duggan, were irrigating their fields. My brothers Darbara Singh, when our turn for irrigating came, asked Amarjit Singh that now it is our turn, you close your Naka, but Amarjit Singh and Kala told my brother Darbara Singh that they would not close the Naka and would will leave the turn after irrigating all their paddy crop and said to my brother that if you will come forward then you will be buried there by cutting into pieces. My brother came to the house at village Duggan out of fear and he narrated about the incident that had occurred with him in the field by Amarjit Siugh and his son Hardip Singh @ Kala. Then I, my brother Darbara Singh and my nephew Jagjit Singh s/o Darbara Singh went to our Tibbian wala khet for irrigating land. We reached the field at about 11 P.M. Then on seeing us, Amarjit Singh and his son Hardip Singh @ Kala went away from there. We started irrigating our paddy crop. It was a moonlit night and one could be identified even from the remote place. The stars were twinkling in the sky completely. There was a clear light of the moon in the sky also. My brother Darbara Singh was tired and he slept on a cot by placing a blanket underneath his head, which was lying in our fields near our electric Tubewell, where we were irrigating. I and my nephew continued irrigating the fields. At about 1 A.M. in the night, we after irrigating from the canal water and were at a distance of about 20 yards from the motor then Hardip Singh @ Kala gave Kahi blows continuously on the head of my brother Darbara Singh. We saw that Amarjit Singh was holding and pressing the legs of Darbara Singh. Only one voice of my brother came that why are you killing me. On seeing this, I and my nephew Jagjit Singh raised a lalkara by saying, “wait, don't go now my son”. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top