IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AMAN KUMAR AND ORS. ......Appellants vs.

SUSHIL KUMAR AND ANR. ......Respondents Reserved on: 09.04.2026 Pronounced on: 10.04.2026 Uploaded on: 10.04.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate for the claimants-appellants.

Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Raj Kumar Bashamboo, Advocate for respondent No.2-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 27.03.2015 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, on account of death of Babli Devi in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 04.12.2012.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed