SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83480

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURINDER KUMAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Surinder Kumar and others . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Punjab and another . . . Respondent(s)

1. Date when the judgment was reserved 01.04.2026 2. Date when the judgment is pronounced 10.04.2026 3. Date when the judgment is uploaded on the website 10.04.2026

4. Whether only operative part of the judgment is Full pronounced or whether the full judgment is pronounced

5. The delay, if any, of the pronouncement of full Not applicable.

judgment, and reasons thereof.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH , J.

1. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 23.09.2014 passed by learned JMIC, Jagraon (Annexure P-5) and judgment dated 04.11.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana (Annexure P-7), whereby petitioners have been summoned as additional accused No.5 to 9 under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in cross case DDR dated 03.02.2012 arising out of FIR No.11 dated 03.02.2012, registered under Sections 323, 341, 294, 506 read with Section

149 IPC at Police Station Raikot,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top