SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83497

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANHARBHAI LAXMANDAS PARYANI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.109 CRM-M-20029-2026 Date of Decision: 10.04.2026 MANHARBHAI LAXMANDAS PARYANI @ MANU BHAI ANR.

...Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate and Mr. Sayyam Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)

1. This is the first petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 Cr.P.C., 1973) for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No. 0143 dated 18.10.2025, registered under Section 420 of the IPC, 1860 (now Section 318 of the BNS, 2023) at Police Station Balachaur, District SBS Nagar.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the present FIR has been registered on the complaint of Satya Devi, who along with her husband was running a firm namely M/s Satya Agro Traders (Potato Farm) at village Raju Majra, District SBS Nagar. It is alleged that the firm used to purchase potatoes from farmers of Punjab on credit basis and thereafter sell the same in Gujarat and clear the payments to the farmers upon receiving the sale proceeds. It is further alleged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top