SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MAYA SINGH ETC. – Appellant
Versus
AMBALA KURUKSHETRA GRAMIN BANK ETC. – Respondent
CWP_4154_2001



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 10.04.2026 1. CWP-4154-2001 (O&M)

Maya Singh and others ... Petitioners Vs.

Ambala Kurukshetra Gramin Bank and others ... Respondents

2. CWP-15471-1999 (O&M)

Mohan Singh and others ... Petitioners Vs.

Ambala Kurukshetra Gramin Bank and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate Mr. Bikramjit Singh Patwalia, Advocate for respondent No.1 (in CWP-4154-2001).

Mr. Suresh Ahlawat, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Maanipur, Advocate for respondents No.2, 3, 7, 8, 10 & 11 (in CWP-4154-2001).

*******

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. CWP-4154-2001 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of criteria laid down by respondent No.1 for promotion from MMGS- I to MMGS-II and also the order dated 02.12.1999 (Annexure P-4), vide which respondents No.2 to 11 were promoted. It is further prayed to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.1 to consider the cases for promotion of all eligible persons as per old promotion policy of 1988.

2. CWP-15471-1999 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the seniority list dated 04.10.1999, vide which the private respondents were declared senior to the petitioners and further to direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits.

3. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of the judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Government of West Bengal and others Vs. Dr. Amal Satpathi and others, 2024 SCC Online SC

3512, the issue of promotion post-retirement cannot be considered and submit that both these petitions may be disposed of having been rendered as infructuous.

4. Ordered accordingly.

5. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.

[ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ]

10.04.2026 JUDGE vishnu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top