SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
EKTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

259 Date of Decision : 09.04.2026 Ekta …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. C.L. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Kanav Singla, A.A.G., Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Agriculture Development Officer as recommended by respondent No.2, vide memo dated 14.06.2023 (Annexure P-6), with all consequential benefits including seniority from the date her batchmates were appointed.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case, as have been pleaded in the present petition, are that Punjab Public Service Commission, vide Advertisement No.09(i) dated 20.12.2016 (Annexure P-1), invited online applications for 141 posts of Agriculture Development Officer (Group-A) including 02 posts for Wards of Freedom Fighter, Punjab (Category No.74). The petitioner, who was serving as Agriculture Sub Inspector in the Department of Agriculture since 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top