SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 83637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PAYAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
CRWP_4129_2026



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 09.04.2026 Payal and another ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Abhijeet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioners namely Payal and Gourav have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from the private respondents.

2. The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 18 years and 23 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 06.04.2026 at Prachin Pashupati Nath Shiv Mandir Society, Gali No.10, Near Fitness Gym, Sector-6 Phatak, Siddharth Nagar, Panipat as per Hindu rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-5) issued by the Purohit/Priest of the aforesaid Mandir has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P-6) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Jind and respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Malar, District Jind and he confines his prayer that the representation may be examined.

4. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only.

5. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Sr. DAG Haryana has appeared and accepted notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. He submits that he has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.

6. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, with a direction to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Malar, District Jind to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P-6) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances.

7. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law.

8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Malar, District Jind for requisite compliance.

9. Disposed of.

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)

09.04.2026 JUDGE

Mangal Singh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top