Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Ramesh Chander Dimri, J
Abdul Shahid – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural withdrawal of applications in criminal petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grant of anticipatory bail based on investigation cooperation and lack of evidence in primary charges. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral)
CRM-24189-2026
1. Application is allowed as prayed for.
CRM-24190-2026
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that an FIR No.384 dated 14.08.2019 under Section 306 and 34 of Indian Penal Code stands registered against the petitioner at Police Station Sector 31, Faridabad but the said fact could not be inadvertently mentioned in the petition. He also states that the pendency of the said FIR against the petitioner has no bearing on decision of the present petition as the petitioner is on bail in the said FIR. He accordingly states that he may be permitted to withdraw the CRM in question as no amendment in a petition filed on criminal side is permitted in law.
3. In view of his such statement, CRM is dismissed as withdrawn.
CRM-M-28600-2026
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that son Javed of the petitioner who was employed as a Patwari in District Faridabad was falsely implicated in a corruption case under Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
