Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Nidhi Gupta, J
Kavita – Appellant
Versus
Vinod – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of claim petition and lower tribunal's dismissal based on evidence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding reliable witness evidence versus criminal court acquittal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court establishes collusion and perjury due to contradictory witness statements. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. legal necessity to reject testimony when contradictory to criminal court filings. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 19 , 20) |
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
The present appeal has been filed by the claimants laying challenge to the Award dated 04.02.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (for short “the learned Tribunal”); whereby Claim Petition No. 364 dated 11.07.2018 filed by the claimants/appellants under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been dismissed. The 4 claimants are the 33-year-old widow; 12-year-old son; 11-year-old daughter; and 77-year-old mother of the deceased Om Parkash, who was 38 years old at the time of accident.
2. It was the pleaded case of the appellants before the learned Tribunal that deceased Om Parkash had died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
