SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 86386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
TILAK RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19994-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 07.05.2026 TILAK RAJ ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. G.S. Khosa, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG Haryana.

..…

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.42 dated 25.03.2026 registered under Sections 61, 318(4), 316(3) of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner in connivance with other co-accused, fraudulently executed an agreement to sell the plot belonging to the complainant and took Rs.5 lakhs as earnest money, which was never received by the complainant. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no connection with the alleged fraud. He submits that the petitioner has been roped in the present case because of the complainant’s fall-out with the primary accused in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top