SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 86706

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N. S. Shekhawati, J
Charanjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRR 547 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Arjun Veer Sharma
For the Respondents: M. S. Bajwa, Ramandeep Kaur

The time limit of three months prescribed under S. 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, for conducting a preliminary assessment for heinous offences is directory, not mandatory, as no consequences for delay are specified in the statute.

Headnote:The case involves the interpretation of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, specifically regarding the timeline for conducting a preliminary assessment for heinous offences. The main contention was whether the three-month period prescribed under S. 14(3) for conducting such an assessment is mandatory, rendering proceedings conducted beyond this period void. The court analyzed whether a juvenile alleged to have committed a heinous offence could be tried as an adult after a significant delay in the preliminary assessment. The core issue was whether the timeline in S. 14(3) is mandatory or directory. The court, drawing on precedents, determined that in the absence of a stated consequence for non-compliance, the provision is directory rather than mandatory. The ratio decidendi established that the absence of explicit penalty for exceeding the three-month window indicates the legislature's intent was not to create an inflexible deadline that terminates proceedings for heinous crimes. The petition challenging the transfer of the case to the Children Court for trial as an adult was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural history and petitioner arguments regarding the mandatory nature of section 14 and 15 of juvenile justice act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. assessment of the mental and physical capacity of the juvenile and response to the procedural timeline objection. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. binding precedent confirming that statutory timelines for preliminary assessments are directory rather than mandatory. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)

N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition against the impugned order dated 13.03.2020 passed by the Court of Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bathinda, as well as the impugned judgment dated 04.03.2021 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Bathinda, whereby, the application filed by the prosecution for treating the petitioner [juvenile (in conflict with law)] as adult was allowed and the case was transferred to Children Court, Bathinda for trial.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the present case on the basis of the FIR (Annexure P1) which was registered on the basis of the statement made by Paramjit Singh and the same has been reproduced below:-

“Statement of Paramjit Singh son of Ajaib Singh Jatt, r/o Jodhpur Pakhar, aged about 45 years, Mobile No. xxxx stated that I am resident of above said address and an agriculturist. I have two sons Sandeep Singh and Sukhdeep Singh. Elder Son Sukhdeep Singh is aged about 25 years, who is unmarried and working as agriculturist. Today in the evening, I had gone to my field at Phundar Walay, in the area of village Jodhpur Pakhar for watering paddy crop and when I was returning to my home from my fields then it was about 08.30 pm. When I reached near Peer Khana near bus stand of our village, then the lights of the Peer Khana were on, where Dharmender Singh son of Joginder Singh armed with axe, Gagandeep Singh Mistri armed with Axe, Mandeep Singh son of Saudagar Singh armed with Axe, Charanjit Singh son of Satta Singh armed with Axe, Kala Singh son of Leela Singh armed with Gandasa, Jat residents of Jodhpur Pakhar were mercilessly giving blows on the head of my son Sukhdeep Singh with their axes and Gandasa. While my son got drenched in blood, I raised alarm and in the meantime, my younger son Mandeep Singh came at the spot. Then, both of us raised alarm and Baggi Singh son of Baljit Singh Nambardar Jatt resident of Jodhpur Pakhar fired three shots in the air with his country made pistol and threatened me and my son Mandeep Singh to kill us. Dharmender Singh etc. ran away from the spot alongwith their weapons. Motive is that yesterday, on 14.08.2016 at about 09.30 p.m., there was power cut in our village and at the time of power cut, Dharmender Singh etc aforesaid were pressurizing Satnam Singh employee of Electricity Department, after getting the electricity from electricity grid, to release electricity supply immediately.

On seeing the dispute turning big, Satnam Singh Electricity Department employee also called up my elder son Sukhdeep Singh. My son Sukhdeep Singh had argument with Dharmender Singh aforesaid. This entire incident pertains to dispute at electricity grid on that day, which was disclosed to me by my son Sukhdeep Singh. About one year back, Manoj Kumar @ Mouji son of Babbarjit Sharma r/o Dayalpur Mirja had fight with my deceased son Sukhdeep Singh, then Manoj Kumar @ Mauji injured my son Sukhdeep Singh by giving fire arm injury after coming to our village, on which we had got registered the FIR against Manoj Kumar @ Mauji, which is pending before Bathinda Court. To compromise that matter, Manoj Kumar @ Mauji was pressurizing my son Sukhdeep Singh and was giving threats to life. I have full faith that there is hand of Manoj Kumar @ Mauji in the murder of my son Sukhdeep Singh. Statement has been recorded. Action be taken against Dharmender Singh etc. Heard it and it is correct. Sd Paramjit Singh aforesaid. Attested by Karamjit Sin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top